summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
blob: dd57e80f99e2b896d1e664c970ef53349474058a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE glsa SYSTEM "http://www.gentoo.org/dtd/glsa.dtd">
<glsa id="201502-15">
  <title>Samba: Multiple vulnerabilities</title>
  <synopsis>Multiple vulnerabilities have been found in Samba, the worst of
    which allowing a context-dependent attacker to bypass intended file
    restrictions, cause a Denial of Service or execute arbitrary code. 
  </synopsis>
  <product type="ebuild">samba</product>
  <announced>February 25, 2015</announced>
  <revised>February 25, 2015: 1</revised>
  <bug>479868</bug>
  <bug>491070</bug>
  <bug>493664</bug>
  <bug>504494</bug>
  <bug>511764</bug>
  <bug>514676</bug>
  <bug>541182</bug>
  <access>local, remote</access>
  <affected>
    <package name="net-fs/samba" auto="yes" arch="*">
      <unaffected range="ge">3.6.25</unaffected>
      <vulnerable range="lt">3.6.25</vulnerable>
    </package>
  </affected>
  <background>
    <p>Samba is a suite of SMB and CIFS client/server programs.</p>
  </background>
  <description>
    <p>Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Samba. Please review
      the CVE identifiers referenced below for details.
    </p>
  </description>
  <impact type="high">
    <p>A context-dependent attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code,
      cause a Denial of Service condition, bypass intended file restrictions,
      or obtain sensitive information.
    </p>
  </impact>
  <workaround>
    <p>There is no known workaround at this time.</p>
  </workaround>
  <resolution>
    <p>All Samba users should upgrade to the latest version:</p>
    
    <code>
      # emerge --sync
      # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose "&gt;=net-fs/samba-3.6.25"
    </code>
  </resolution>
  <references>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2012-6150">CVE-2012-6150</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4124">CVE-2013-4124</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4408">CVE-2013-4408</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4475">CVE-2013-4475</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4476">CVE-2013-4476</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2013-4496">CVE-2013-4496</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0178">CVE-2014-0178</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0239">CVE-2014-0239</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-0244">CVE-2014-0244</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2014-3493">CVE-2014-3493</uri>
    <uri link="http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2015-0240">CVE-2015-0240</uri>
  </references>
  <metadata tag="requester" timestamp="Wed, 21 May 2014 04:10:53 +0000">
    BlueKnight
  </metadata>
  <metadata tag="submitter" timestamp="Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:04:57 +0000">K_F</metadata>
</glsa>