aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndré Erdmann <dywi@mailerd.de>2014-07-16 00:56:45 +0200
committerAndré Erdmann <dywi@mailerd.de>2014-07-16 00:56:45 +0200
commite7fe82f8d489cb3ddb8f79504760808011e32108 (patch)
treeff11d886dfdbe7b214f3f5ce78f9ebd80189dac3
parentpackage rules, addition control: change "default" (diff)
downloadR_overlay-e7fe82f8d489cb3ddb8f79504760808011e32108.tar.gz
R_overlay-e7fe82f8d489cb3ddb8f79504760808011e32108.tar.bz2
R_overlay-e7fe82f8d489cb3ddb8f79504760808011e32108.zip
addition control rule gen: partial implementation
Refinement and implementation/refinement of steps 2..5. Todo list for the addition control generator module: * add category, package token objects (e.g. tuples) * step 1: read+create tokens and create the acceptor_chain -> bitmask map * step 5: implement a package rule generator object with proper {category,package}_token_to_acceptor() methods * remove SillyAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator, which translates all tokens into TrueAcceptors (not useful anyway, just for testing while a real gen. is not implemented)
-rw-r--r--roverlay/packagerules/generators/addition_control.py506
1 files changed, 499 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/roverlay/packagerules/generators/addition_control.py b/roverlay/packagerules/generators/addition_control.py
index 46660d6..20c4b29 100644
--- a/roverlay/packagerules/generators/addition_control.py
+++ b/roverlay/packagerules/generators/addition_control.py
@@ -4,10 +4,49 @@
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License;
# either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+from __future__ import absolute_import
+# temporary_demo_func():
+from __future__ import print_function
+
+
+import abc
+# __metaclass__/metaclass= workaround
+_AbstractObject = abc.ABCMeta ( str("AbstractObject"), ( object, ), {} )
+
+import collections
+
+#~ import roverlay.util.fileio
+import roverlay.util.namespace
+#~
+import roverlay.packagerules.abstract.acceptors
+import roverlay.packagerules.abstract.rules
+#~ import roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.stringmatch
+#~ import roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.util
+import roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.trivial
+import roverlay.packagerules.actions.addition_control
+#~
+#~ from roverlay.packagerules.abstract.rules import (
+ #~ NestedPackageRule, PackageRule
+#~ )
+#~
+#~ from roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.stringmatch (
+ #~ NocaseStringAcceptor, StringAcceptor,
+ #~ RegexAcceptor, ExactRegexAcceptor
+#~ )
+#~
+#~ from roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.util import (
+ #~ get_package, get_package_name, get_ebuild_name, get_category,
+ #~ DEFAULT_CATEGORY_REPLACEMENT
+#~ )
+
+import roverlay.overlay.abccontrol
+from roverlay.overlay.abccontrol import AdditionControlResult
+
+
# converting addition-control lists (cmdline, from file...) to rule objects,
# hacky solution:
#
-# ** step 1 -- collect category/package tokens, determine bitmask **
+# ** step 1 ** -- collect category/package tokens, determine bitmask
#
# create a dict (
# category_token|True => package_token|True => bitmask<policy>
@@ -18,10 +57,52 @@
# "True" means "accept all".
#
# make sure that the tokens get de-duped
-# (normalize values, use tuples/namespace)
+# (normalize values, use tuples (or namespace))
#
+# Only the first and the last step need to know *what* category/package
+# tokens are. All intermediate steps should not need to care about this.
#
-# ** step 2 -- expand category-wide bitmask, set effective package bitmask **
+
+
+
+class AbstractAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator ( _AbstractObject ):
+
+ #CategoryToken = collections.namedtuple ( 'CategoryToken', '<attr>' )
+ #PackageToken = collections.namedtuple ( 'PackageToken', '<attr>' )
+
+ @abc.abstractmethod
+ def category_token_to_acceptor ( self, category_token, priority ):
+ raise NotImplementedError()
+
+ @abc.abstractmethod
+ def package_token_to_acceptor ( self, category_token, priority ):
+ raise NotImplementedError()
+
+ def create_package_rules ( self, reduced_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ):
+ # create_package_rules() is defined/implemented below (step 5)
+ return create_package_rules (
+ reduced_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map,
+ convert_category_token_to_acceptor = self.category_token_to_acceptor,
+ convert_package_token_to_acceptor = self.package_token_to_acceptor
+ )
+ # --- end of create_package_rules (...) ---
+
+# --- end of AbstractAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator ---
+
+
+def abstract_category_token_to_acceptor ( category_token, priority, namespace ):
+ raise NotImplementedError()
+# --- end of abstract_category_token_to_acceptor (...) ---
+
+def abstract_package_token_to_acceptor ( package_token, priority, namespace ):
+ raise NotImplementedError()
+# --- end of abstract_package_token_to_acceptor (...) ---
+
+
+#
+# ** step 2 ** -- expand global and category-wide bitmasks,
+# set effective package bitmask
+# (FIXME: does it make sense to apply the global bitmask?)
#
# for each category with at least one non-True package_token loop
# for each package in category loop
@@ -39,6 +120,63 @@
#
# (merge the two for-loops in code)
#
+
+def expand_acceptor_chain_bitmasks ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map ):
+ # naming convention: >e<ffective bit>mask< => emask
+ # inplace operation (returns None and modifies the obj directly)
+
+ get_emask = AdditionControlResult.get_effective_package_policy
+
+
+ def normalize_entry ( mapping, key, additional_emask=0 ):
+ new_value = get_emask ( mapping [key] | additional_emask )
+ mapping [key] = new_value
+ return new_value
+ # --- end of normalize_entry (...) ---
+
+ def normalize_entry_maybe_missing ( mapping, key, additional_emask=0 ):
+ if key in mapping:
+ return normalize_entry ( mapping, key, additional_emask )
+ else:
+ mapping [key] = additional_emask
+ return additional_emask
+ # --- end of normalize_entry_maybe_missing (...) ---
+
+
+
+ # propagate global/category-wide emask to package_token entries
+
+ # acceptor_chain_bitmask_map->True->True is the global emask
+ if True in acceptor_chain_bitmask_map:
+ global_emask = normalize_entry_maybe_missing (
+ acceptor_chain_bitmask_map [True], True
+ )
+ else:
+ global_emask = 0
+
+
+ for category_token, package_token_map in acceptor_chain_bitmask_map.items():
+ # --- cannot modify acceptor_chain_bitmask_map in this block
+
+ category_emask = normalize_entry_maybe_missing (
+ package_token_map, True, global_emask
+ )
+
+ for package_token in package_token_map:
+ # --- cannot modify acceptor_chain_bitmask_map, package_token_map
+ if package_token is not True:
+ # else already processed (category_emask)
+ normalize_entry (
+ package_token_map, package_token, category_emask
+ )
+ # -- end if <package_token>
+ # -- end for <package_token>
+
+ # -- end for <category_token,package_token_map>
+
+# --- end of expand_acceptor_chain_bitmasks (...) ---
+
+
#
# ** step 3 -- create reversed map **
#
@@ -52,15 +190,43 @@
# **hacky**:
# It would be better to split effective_bitmask into its components
# (2**k for k in ...), but this requires path compaction.
-# Not implemented. (graph/spanning-tree or logic minimization)
+# Not implemented. (graph/spanning-tree and/or logic minimization)
#
+
+def create_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map ):
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map = {}
+
+ for category_token, package_token_map in acceptor_chain_bitmask_map.items():
+
+ for package_token, emask in package_token_map.items():
+ try:
+ emask_entry = bitmask_acceptor_chain_map [emask]
+ except KeyError:
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map [emask] = {
+ category_token: set ({ package_token, })
+ }
+ else:
+ try:
+ category_entry = emask_entry [category_token]
+ except KeyError:
+ emask_entry [category_token] = set ({ package_token, })
+ else:
+ category_entry.add ( package_token )
+ # -- end for <package token map>
+
+ # -- end for <category token map>
+
+ return bitmask_acceptor_chain_map
+# --- end of create_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map (...) ---
+
+
#
# ** step 4 -- naive path compaction **
# (Keep in mind that acceptor tokens cannot be merged with match-all)
#
# reduce acceptor chains (drop-superseeded):
# for each effective_bitmask b in BITMASK_MAP loop
-# if BITMASK_MAP->b->True exists then
+# if BITMASK_MAP->b->True->True exists then
# drop all other entries from BITMASK_MAP->b
# else
# for each category in BITMASK_MAP->b loop
@@ -96,12 +262,50 @@
#
# ++ reduce table
#
+
+def reduce_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ( bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ):
+ # could be integrated in create_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map(),
+ # but kept separate for better readability
+ #
+ # Note that the actual implementation uses empty sets/dicts in the
+ # reduced bitmask->acceptor chain mask to represent "match-all".
+ #
+
+ # ** inplace **
+
+ # emask==0 can be ignored
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map.pop ( 0, True )
+
+ for emask in bitmask_acceptor_chain_map:
+ emask_matches_all = False
+
+ for category_token, package_token_set in (
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map [emask].items()
+ ):
+ if True not in package_token_set:
+ # category~DONT_CARE, package!=True <=> keep entries
+ pass
+ elif category_token is True:
+ # category==True, package==True <=> match all, *** BREAK LOOP ***
+ emask_matches_all = True
+ break
+ else:
+ # category!=True, package==True <=> match entire category
+ package_token_set.clear()
+ # -- end for <category->package token map>
+
+ if emask_matches_all:
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map [emask].clear()
+ # -- end for <emask>
+# --- end of reduce_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map (...) ---
+
+
#
# ** step 5 -- convert the acceptor chains to objects **
#
-# the final BITMASK_MAP can be easily translated to rule objects:
+# the final BITMASK_MAP can be easily translated into rule objects:
#
-# * the effective bitmask can be converted in one or more
+# * convert the the effective bitmask into one or more
# PackageAdditionControl*Actions
#
# * an OR<category OR<packages>> match statement
@@ -111,3 +315,291 @@
#
# ** done **
#
+
+def create_packagerule_action_map():
+ # dict < int~2**k => packagerule action >
+ return {
+ action_cls.CONTROL_RESULT: action_cls (
+ priority=action_cls.CONTROL_RESULT
+ )
+ for action_cls in (
+ getattr (
+ roverlay.packagerules.actions.addition_control,
+ action_cls_name
+ ) for action_cls_name in (
+ roverlay.packagerules.actions.addition_control.ACTIONS
+ )
+ ) if action_cls.CONTROL_RESULT
+ }
+# --- end of create_packagerule_action_map (...) ---
+
+
+
+def create_package_rules (
+ reduced_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map,
+ convert_category_token_to_acceptor,
+ convert_package_token_to_acceptor
+):
+ packagerule_actions = create_packagerule_action_map()
+ # true acceptor with priority -1
+ always_true_acceptor = (
+ roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.trivial.TrueAcceptor ( priority=-1 )
+ )
+
+
+ def get_acceptor_recursive ( category_token_map, priority ):
+ # Note: it's illegal to set an acceptor's priority after its creation
+ # this would violate namespace->get_object()
+ # ==> use 0 as priority for objects where it doesn't matter much
+ # (at the cost of unstable-sorted output)
+ #
+ # The acceptor gets wrapped with an Acceptor_AND object anyway(*),
+ # no need to set any priority.
+ # (*) "the top-level logic of a MATCH-block is AND by convention"
+ # the acceptor returned by get_*acceptor*() can be of *any*
+ # type, but its str representation (--print-package-rules)
+ # would always be the same.
+ #
+ # ["proper" prio-setting is already implemented at
+ # package/category acceptor level, so the outmost AND acceptor
+ # has exactly one member and the member's priority matches
+ # the acceptor's]
+ #
+
+ def get_package_acceptor ( package_tokens, prio ):
+ if not package_tokens:
+ raise ValueError ( "package token set must not be empty!" )
+
+ elif len(package_tokens) == 1:
+ # special case: bind prio to package_acceptor
+ return convert_package_token_to_acceptor (
+ next(iter(package_tokens)), prio
+ )
+
+ else:
+ package_acceptors = [
+ convert_package_token_to_acceptor ( package_token, 0 )
+ for package_token in package_tokens
+ ]
+
+ # package acceptors get ORed, no need to set a specific priority
+ combined_acceptor = (
+ roverlay.packagerules.abstract.acceptors.Acceptor_OR ( prio )
+ )
+
+ for package_acceptor in package_acceptors:
+ combined_acceptor.add_acceptor ( package_acceptor )
+
+ return combined_acceptor
+
+ # --- end of get_package_acceptor (...) ---
+
+ def get_category_acceptor ( category_token, package_tokens, prio ):
+ if category_token is True:
+ return get_package_acceptor ( package_tokens, prio )
+
+ elif package_tokens:
+ acceptor = (
+ roverlay.packagerules.abstract.acceptors.Acceptor_AND ( prio )
+ )
+
+ # match category first and then packages
+ acceptor.add_acceptor (
+ convert_category_token_to_acceptor ( category_token, 0 )
+ )
+ acceptor.add_acceptor (
+ get_package_acceptor ( package_tokens, 1 )
+ )
+
+ return acceptor
+
+ else:
+ return convert_category_token_to_acceptor ( category_token, prio )
+ # --- end of get_category_acceptor (...) ---
+
+ if not category_token_map:
+ # match-all
+ return always_true_acceptor
+
+ elif len(category_token_map) == 1:
+ # special case: bind priority to entry
+ category_acceptor = None
+ for category_token, package_tokens in category_token_map.items():
+ if category_acceptor is None:
+ category_acceptor = get_category_acceptor (
+ category_token, package_tokens, priority
+ )
+ else:
+ raise AssertionError ( "must not loop more than once." )
+ # -- end for
+
+ return category_acceptor
+
+ else:
+ acceptors = [
+ get_category_acceptor ( category_token, package_tokens, k )
+ for ( k, ( category_token, package_tokens ) ) in enumerate (
+ category_token_map.items()
+ )
+ ]
+
+ combined_acceptor = (
+ roverlay.packagerules.abstract.acceptors.Acceptor_OR ( priority )
+ )
+
+ for acceptor in acceptors:
+ combined_acceptor.add_acceptor ( acceptor )
+
+ return combined_acceptor
+
+ # --- end of get_acceptor_recursive (...) ---
+
+ def create_rule ( category_token_map, emask ):
+ # wrap actual acceptor with Acceptor_AND, see above
+ actual_acceptor = get_acceptor_recursive ( category_token_map, 0 )
+ and_acceptor = roverlay.packagerules.abstract.acceptors.Acceptor_AND (0)
+ and_acceptor.add_acceptor ( actual_acceptor )
+
+ rule = roverlay.packagerules.abstract.rules.PackageRule ( priority=emask )
+
+ rule.set_acceptor ( and_acceptor )
+
+ have_any_action = False
+ for k, action in packagerule_actions.items():
+ have_any_action = True
+ if ( k & emask ):
+ rule.add_action ( action )
+
+ if not have_any_action:
+ raise AssertionError (
+ "rule object has no actions - bad emask? {:#x}".format (
+ emask=emask
+ )
+ )
+
+ return rule
+ # --- end of create_rule (...) ---
+
+ rules = [
+ create_rule ( category_token_map, emask )
+ for emask, category_token_map in \
+ reduced_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map.items()
+ ]
+
+ if not rules:
+ return None
+
+ elif len(rules) == 1:
+ rules [0].priority = -1
+ return rules [0]
+
+ else:
+ combined_rule = roverlay.packagerules.abstract.rules.NestedPackageRule (
+ priority = -1
+ )
+ combined_rule.set_acceptor ( always_true_acceptor )
+
+ for rule in rules:
+ combined_rule.add_rule ( rule )
+
+ return combined_rule
+ # -- end if
+
+# --- end of create_package_rules (...) ---
+
+class SillyAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator (
+ AbstractAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator
+):
+ """
+ An add-policy package rule generator that doesn't care about its tokens.
+
+ Not useful for productive usage - will be removed as soon as a proper
+ rule generator has been implemented.
+ """
+
+ def __init__ ( self ):
+ super ( SillyAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator, self ).__init__()
+ self.namespace = roverlay.util.namespace.SimpleNamespace()
+
+ def _get_true_accepor_from_namespace ( self, any_token, priority ):
+ return self.namespace.get_object_v (
+ roverlay.packagerules.acceptors.trivial.TrueAcceptor,
+ ( priority, ),
+ {}
+ )
+
+ category_token_to_acceptor = _get_true_accepor_from_namespace
+ package_token_to_acceptor = _get_true_accepor_from_namespace
+
+
+
+
+def temporary_demo_func():
+ rule_generator = SillyAdditionControlPackageRuleGenerator()
+ add_control_rule = None
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map = None
+ acceptor_chain_bitmask_map = {
+ True: {
+ True: AdditionControlResult.PKG_REVBUMP_ON_COLLISION,
+ 'p0': 8|2,
+ },
+ 'c': {
+ True: 2,
+ },
+ 'd': {
+ True: AdditionControlResult.PKG_REPLACE_ONLY,
+ },
+ 'f': {
+ 'p1': AdditionControlResult.PKG_REPLACE_ONLY,
+ },
+ }
+
+ print ( "** initial acceptor_chain -> raw_bitmask map" )
+ print ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map )
+ print()
+
+ expand_acceptor_chain_bitmasks ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map )
+ print ( "** expanded acceptor_chain -> effective_bitmask map" )
+ print ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map )
+ print()
+
+ bitmask_acceptor_chain_map = (
+ create_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ( acceptor_chain_bitmask_map )
+ )
+ print ( "** initial effective_bitmask -> acceptor_chain map" )
+ print(bitmask_acceptor_chain_map)
+ print()
+
+ reduce_bitmask_acceptor_chain_map ( bitmask_acceptor_chain_map )
+ print ( "** reduced effective_bitmask -> acceptor_chain map" )
+ print(bitmask_acceptor_chain_map)
+ print()
+
+ add_control_rule = (
+ rule_generator.create_package_rules ( bitmask_acceptor_chain_map )
+ )
+ add_control_rule.priority = -1
+ add_control_rule.prepare()
+
+ print ( "** created package rule (sorted)" )
+ print(add_control_rule)
+ print()
+
+ print ( "** content of the rule generator\'s namespace" )
+ print ( rule_generator.namespace._objects )
+
+# --- end of temporary_demo_func (...) ---
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ import sys
+ import os
+
+ try:
+ temporary_demo_func()
+ except KeyboardInterrupt:
+ excode = os.EX_OK ^ 130
+ else:
+ excode = os.EX_OK
+
+ sys.exit ( excode )