Merging r279647:llvmorg-3.9.0-rc3llvmorg-3.9.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r279647 | sanjoy | 2016-08-24 11:10:21 -0700 (Wed, 24 Aug 2016) | 5 lines

[SCCP] Don't delete side-effecting instructions

I'm not sure if the `!isa<CallInst>(Inst) &&
!isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst))` bit is correct either, but this fixes the
case we know is broken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

llvm-svn: 279689

2 files changed, 21 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
index da700f18cdaf..f74f28abf85a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
@@ -1538,17 +1538,6 @@ static bool tryToReplaceWithConstant(SCCPSolver &Solver, Value *V) {
   return true;
 }
 
-static bool tryToReplaceInstWithConstant(SCCPSolver &Solver, Instruction *Inst,
-                                         bool shouldEraseFromParent) {
-  if (!tryToReplaceWithConstant(Solver, Inst))
-    return false;
-
-  // Delete the instruction.
-  if (shouldEraseFromParent)
-    Inst->eraseFromParent();
-  return true;
-}
-
 // runSCCP() - Run the Sparse Conditional Constant Propagation algorithm,
 // and return true if the function was modified.
 //
@@ -1597,8 +1586,9 @@ static bool runSCCP(Function &F, const DataLayout &DL,
       if (Inst->getType()->isVoidTy() || isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst))
         continue;
 
-      if (tryToReplaceInstWithConstant(Solver, Inst,
-                                       true /* shouldEraseFromParent */)) {
+      if (tryToReplaceWithConstant(Solver, Inst)) {
+        if (isInstructionTriviallyDead(Inst))
+          Inst->eraseFromParent();
         // Hey, we just changed something!
         MadeChanges = true;
         ++NumInstRemoved;
@@ -1789,10 +1779,9 @@ static bool runIPSCCP(Module &M, const DataLayout &DL,
         Instruction *Inst = &*BI++;
         if (Inst->getType()->isVoidTy())
           continue;
-        if (tryToReplaceInstWithConstant(
-                Solver, Inst,
-                !isa<CallInst>(Inst) &&
-                    !isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst) /* shouldEraseFromParent */)) {
+        if (tryToReplaceWithConstant(Solver, Inst)) {
+          if (!isa<CallInst>(Inst) && !isa<TerminatorInst>(Inst))
+            Inst->eraseFromParent();
           // Hey, we just changed something!
           MadeChanges = true;
           ++IPNumInstRemoved;
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/calltest.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/calltest.ll
index 9dec22f4d1cd..a6c2606cb198 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/calltest.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/calltest.ll
@@ -1,12 +1,16 @@
-; RUN: opt < %s -sccp -loop-deletion -simplifycfg -S | not grep br
+; RUN: opt < %s -sccp -loop-deletion -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
 
+declare double @sqrt(double) readnone nounwind
+%empty = type {}
+declare %empty @has_side_effects()
+
+define double @test_0(i32 %param) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_0(
+; CHECK-NOT: br
+entry:
 ; No matter how hard you try, sqrt(1.0) is always 1.0.  This allows the
 ; optimizer to delete this loop.
 
-declare double @sqrt(double)
-
-define double @test(i32 %param) {
-entry:
 	br label %Loop
 Loop:		; preds = %Loop, %entry
 	%I2 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %I3, %Loop ]		; <i32> [#uses=1]
@@ -19,3 +23,9 @@ Exit:		; preds = %Loop
 	ret double %V
 }
 
+define i32 @test_1() {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test_1(
+; CHECK: call %empty @has_side_effects()
+  %1 = call %empty @has_side_effects()
+  ret i32 0
+}