| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Followup to:
* 854887066c3d32ae4961f9eb29a91a8d1785d26c (profiles/prefix/darwin/macos/10.5/x86: add gcc sub-profile)
* 3788eef280dcff5d415b4b1c3af1c1e58767a0b1 (profiles: restore 32-bits Intel Mac OS X 10.5 profile)
This fixes the following from pkgcheck (and a new warning in CI -> PRs fail):
```
ArchesOutOfSync 'profiles/arches.desc' is out of sync with 'arch.list', arch: x86-macos
```
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
[sam: Add bug #332175 and bug #498878 ref.]
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/332175
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/498878
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
[sam: Added bug #771078 ref.]
[sam: See also https://github.com/trofi/nix-guix-gentoo/commit/8f194519982fbfabb6b3ca84c0806b1a379b5d06 and
https://github.com/trofi/nix-guix-gentoo/commit/43d84cc00af530ef912d9c98448b64d6b5282907].
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/771078
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
elibtoolize is not good enough for this software because it uses a
random libtool version, so patches don't tend to apply.
Fixes QA warnings for failing to respect -frecord-gcc-switches.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We got rid of the terrible usr-ldscript hack. It is now possible to
build this sanely. Force it to rebuild against the updated pam (for the
sake of split-usr profiles).
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825758
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per news item 2024-01-05-usr-initramfs, we no longer support this use
case. It is fragile and hacky and leads to bizarre forms of load errors.
The functionality is, despite being called "split-usr", not really about
split-usr at all.
[sam: add bug #868306 ref.]
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825078
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825758
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/868306
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a current -Werror failure. I have also submitted a patch upstream to
drop -Werror.
Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923870
Signed-off-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35205
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Craig Andrews <candrews@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Craig Andrews <candrews@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Bernard Cafarelli <voyageur@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <zx2c4@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/866575
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also effectively no more development.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/921430
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/921686
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923871
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
|