| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923998
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/924211
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931059
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Listen, I definitely know it's LTO-unsafe.
I can't actually get it to compile, but either way, it's definitely
LTO-unsafe...
The next compilation error is:
```
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: resources.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: NOTE: This behaviour is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of the linker
resources.o:(.rsrc$01+0x80): dangerous relocation: R_AMD64_IMAGEBASE with __ImageBase undefined
resources.o:(.rsrc$01+0x90): dangerous relocation: R_AMD64_IMAGEBASE with __ImageBase undefined
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [Makefile:436: ros] Error 1
```
As you can tell from the linker error, it appears to be lisp code... if
anyone can figure out why it happens you're welcome to it but I am not
spending more time on lisp so this is me backing away now that the LTO
bug can be closed. So long!
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/856106
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/856103
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Needed to e.g. pass LTO warning flags through to the linker.
Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/931061
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Adding support would require adding multilib support in libdeflate.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/930111
Signed-off-by: Alfred Wingate <parona@protonmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/36500
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we now have RESTRICT="test" in the newer 0.20.0 ebuild
we should also do the same for the old version which we
hopefully can drop soon anyway.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/904314
Signed-off-by: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also set RESTRICT="test" because there are many failures.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/904314
Signed-off-by: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TODO:
According to developer/s, frame->mplex->win would be a more type-safe way to
achieve the same, but then it becomes less clear whether this is an 'is' or a
'has' relationship.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919249
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/36498
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/900168
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
|