| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="arm"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
running systemd.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add use flags for things upstream has exposed while disabling things
which make no sense to run on the host
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all the cool kids are doing it
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/649220
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="ppc"
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Closes:#7302
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so I added gnuradio to your gnuradio so you can next while you maint
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gr-osmosdr can't build if old rtlsdr and new gnuradio-9999 is installed,
but now we have the new rtlsdr snapshot so just let users upgrade like
normal.
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
bump, minor updates
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
rewrite of rtl_power using soapy backend
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
needed dep for soapy_power and gr-osmosdr
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
module for soapysdr
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
module for soapysdr
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
module for soapysdr
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
module for soapysdr
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
update to eapi 6
attempt to switch to https
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
drop old ebuilds
drop wxwidgets support from 3.6 slot
update to eapi 6
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this is not any better, but it is newer
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove useless/redundant maintainer <description/>. It does not benefit
bug wrangling, and only wastes developer's time on reading it. Few tips:
- assignee/CC is implied by ordering, there is no reason to repeat it,
- we know that maintainer is maintainer (la la la la la),
- most of adjectives for maintainer are of no value and/or are obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/597098
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/597614
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.24, Repoman-2.3.6
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/646312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As reported by Mike Lothian in bug #643520 and implemented
by "Cyrillic", 4.15 kernels require both regulatory.db and
the corresponding PKCS#7 signature.
Straight to stable as per the precedent set by previous
commits from Richard "Zero-Chaos" Farina.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/643520
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
RepoMan-Options: --force
|
|
|
|
| |
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.19, Repoman-2.3.6
|